欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

因榍石在变质岩中含量太少,晶体光学特征不明显,利用偏光显微镜及X射线衍射(X RD )等鉴定技术不易确定。实验利用扫描电镜/能谱仪检测矿物所含元素的种类,确定各元素的大致含量,根据定性分析结果,调用相应的标准样品数据文件,建立所测样品的文件清单。运用Casino程序和Quanta程序,据所测元素的强度值计算出样品中各元素的质量分数,依据矿物化学式中阴阳离子电价平衡的配比规律,计算出所测样品的化学组成。分析结果表明,所测8个样品中 SiO2质量分数在33.36%~34.10%之间,CaO 质量分数在25.85%~27.00%之间,(TiO2+Fe2 O3+Al2 O3+CrO2)质量分数在39.31%~40.45%之间,与榍石主要化学成分基本一致。实验表明,同一件榍石样品平行测定10次,O、Si、Ca、T i、Fe元素测定结果的相对标准偏差(RSD )依次为0.23%、0.30%、0.28%、0.26%、1.6%,精密度符合要求;经验证,实验方法的测定结果与电子探针波谱法测定结果相符。

Since the content of sphene in metamorphic rocks w as very low and the optical characteristics of crystal were not obvious , it was difficultly identified by polarizing microscope and X‐ray diffraction (XRD) .The elements in ore were detected by scanning electron microscope/energy disperse spectrometer (SEM/EDS) to obtained the approximate content of elements .Based on the qualitative analysis results , the file list of testing samples was established using the corresponding data file of standard sample .The mass fraction of elements in sample was calculated according to the strength of elements using Casino pro‐cedure and Quanta procedure .Then ,the chemical composition of testing sample was calculated according to the ratio law of anion‐cation electrovalence balance in mineral chemical formula .The analysis results in‐dicated that the mass fraction of SiO2 ,CaO and (TiO2 + Fe2 O3 + Al2 O3 + CrO2 ) in eight samples was 33.36%‐34.10% ,25.85%‐27.00% and 39.31%‐40.45% ,respectively ,which was basically consistent with the main chemical composition of sphene .The experimental results indicated that the relative stand‐ard deviation (RSD ,n=10) of O ,Si ,Ca ,Ti and Fe in one sphene sample was 0.23% ,0.30% ,0.28% , 0.26% and 1.6% ,respectively .The precision could meet the requirements .The determination results of proposed method were consistent with those obtained by electron microprobe spectroscopy .

参考文献

[1] 迟广成;肖刚;汪寅夫;胡建飞;王海娇;马健生.铁矿石矿物组分的X射线粉晶衍射半定量分析[J].冶金分析,2015(1):38-44.
[2] 迟广成;宋丽华;王娜;崔德松;周国兴.X射线粉晶衍射仪在山东蒙阴金伯利岩蚀变矿物鉴定中的应用[J].岩矿测试,2010(4):475-477.
[3] 姚骏恩.电子显微镜的现状与展望[J].电子显微学报,1998(06):767.
[4] 余卫华;陈士华;李江文;张穗忠.辉光放电离子溅射在扫描电镜样品制备中的应用[J].冶金分析,2011(3):6-10.
[5] 严春莲;鞠新华;任群;尹立新;温娟.电子探针分析钢表面氧化铁皮的状态[J].冶金分析,2013(7):51-57.
[6] 廖乾初.改善场发射扫描电镜分辨本领的原理和展望[J].电子显微学报,2000(05):709-716.
[7] Ichiko Misumi;Satoshi Gonda;Tomizo Kurosawa;Yoshihisa Tanimura;Naofumi Ochiai;Jun-ichiro Kitta;Fumio Kubota;Mitsuhiko Yamada;Yoshinobu Fujiwara;Yoshinori Nakayama;Kiyoshi Takamasu.Submicrometre-pitch intercomparison between optical diffraction, scanning electron microscope and atomic force microscope[J].Measurement Science & Technology,200312(12):2065-2074.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%