欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

研究了操作压力和溶液组成(溶质浓度、pH值和水质硬度)对牛血清蛋白在超滤过程中发生的膜污染的影响,同时使用扫描电子显微镜观察了实验所用的超滤膜的结构.研究发现,在膜过滤的过程中,存在着极限膜通量,增大操作压力和进水中蛋白质浓度只能加速膜污染的速度,但不能增强最后的膜污染程度;增大溶液的pH值,以及减小水质硬度,都能够减轻蛋白质在超滤过程中的膜污染程度.

Effect of applied pressure and solution composition (solute concentration, pH and hardness) on mem-brane fouling during uhrafihration (UF) of bovine serum albumin (BSA) was systematically investigated.In addition, structure of the UF membrane used was imaged by the scanning electron microscope (SEM).It was found that (1) limiting flux existed during the membrane filtration process; (2) increasing the applied pressure and protein concentration only increased the fouling rate but did not enhance the extent of membrane fouling; (3) membrane fouling was alleviated while pH was increased and hardness was decreased.

参考文献

[1] Baker R W.Membrane Technology and Applications[M].Menlo Park,California:Membrane Technology and Research,Inc,2004
[2] Singh R.Hybrid Membrane Systems for Water Purification[M].Colorado Springs,USA:USFilter PWS,Inc,2006
[3] Wui Seng Ang;Menachem Elimelech .Protein (BSA) fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: Implications for wastewater reclamation[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2007(1/2):83-92.
[4] Seoktae Kang;Ayse Asatekin;Anne M. Mayes;Menachem Elimelech .Protein antifouling mechanisms of PAN UF membranes incorporating PAN-g-PEO additive[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2007(1/2):42-50.
[5] Rebhun M;Manka J .Classification of organics in secondary effluents[J].Environmental Science and Technology,1971,5(07):606-609.
[6] DUNCAN J. BARKER;DAVID C. STUCKEY .A REVIEW OF SOLUBLE MICROBIAL PRODUCTS (SMP) IN WASTEWATER TREATMENT SYSTEMS[J].Water research: A journal of the international water association,1999(14):3063-3082.
[7] Kim K J;Fane A G;Fell C J D et al.Fouling mechanisms of membranes during protein ultrafiltration[J].Journal of Membrane Science,1992,68(1-2):79-91.
[8] Huisman IH.;Hernandez A.;Pradanos P. .The effect of protein-protein and protein-membrane interactions on membrane fouling in ultrafiltration[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2000(1/2):79-90.
[9] Jones Kimberly L.;O Melia Charles R. .Protein and humic acid adsorption onto hydrophilic membrane surfaces: effects of pH and ionic strength[J].Journal of Membrane Science,2000(1):31-46.
[10] Palecek S P;Zydney A L .Hydraulic permeability of protein deposits formed during microfihration:Effect of solution pH and ionic strength[J].Journal of Membrane Science,1994,95(01):71-81.
[11] Herrero C.;Calvo JI.;Tejerina F.;Hernandez A.;Pradanos P. .FLUX DECLINE IN PROTEIN MICROFILTRATION - INFLUENCE OF OPERATIVE PARAMETERS[J].Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,1997(2):344-351.
[12] Ho CC.;Zydney AL. .A combined pore blockage and cake filtration model for protein fouling during microfiltration[J].Journal of Colloid and Interface Science,2000(2):389-399.
[13] Tang C Y;Leckie J O .Membrane independent limiting flux for RO and NF membranes fouled by humic acid[J].Environmental Science and Technology,2007,41(13):4 767-4 773.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%