为研究不同植物的滞尘规律,以青岛市城阳区道路绿地中的8种灌木(大叶黄杨、火棘、红叶石楠、金叶女贞、连翘、珍珠梅、红瑞木、小蜡)为研究对象,测定各植物的滞尘量,探究植物叶表面结构与其最大滞尘量的相互关系.结果表明,8种灌木中常绿灌木的滞尘量普遍比落叶灌木高,大叶黄杨、火棘在春季雨后30 d的平均单位叶面积滞尘量较高,可达到1.4 g·m-2,连翘的滞尘量较低,仅为0.9 g·m-2;各灌木达到单位叶面积内最大滞尘量的时间在21 d到27 d不等,平均在第24天左右,单位叶面积最大滞尘量最高的火棘(2.02 g·m-2)达到最低的连翘滞尘量(1.07 g·m-2)的近2倍;8种灌木各季节的平均滞尘量总体上表现为秋季>春季>夏季.叶表面结构观测表明,叶表面平整但蜡质层较厚、气孔密集且开口较大的植物滞尘能力较高,同时得到8种灌木最大滞尘量与叶表面结构的拟合曲线,结果表明,滞尘量与气孔大小呈正相关关系,与沟槽比例呈负相关关系,与叶毛数量、气孔密度关系不显著.
In order to study the dust?detaining capability and its rules of different plant, eight shrubs ( Euonymus japonicas, Pyracantha fortuneana, Photinia × frasery, Ligustrum × vicaryi, Forsythia suspense, Sorbaria sorbifolia, Cornus alba, Ligustrum sinense ) in road greenbelt in Chengyang district of Qingdao city were chosen to measure and compare its content of dust retention, and the interrelations between surface structure of the leaves and its largest content of dust retention were explored. The results showed that in eight shrubs, the content of dust retention of evergreen shrubs was generally higher than deciduous shrubs. The average content of dust retention per unite leaf area of Euonymus japonicus and Pyracantha fortuneana within 30 days after the rain in spring was high ( up to 1. 4 g·m-2 ) , while Forsythia suspensa was low ( only 0. 9 g·m-2 ) . The duration of shrubs getting to the largest content of dust detention per unite leaf area was 21 days to 27 days with an average of 24 days. The highest cumulative content of dust detention per unite leaf area of Pyracantha fortuneana (2.02 g·m-2) was nearly twice of the lowest cumulative content of Forsythia suspensa (1.07 g·m-2). The changed trend of content per unite leaf area of eight shrubs in each season generally was autumn>spring>summer. Higher dust?retaining capability of plant was found in smooth but thick waxy leaves, or leaves with denser and big stomata, by observing the surface structure of the leaves. The fitting curves for the largest content of dust retention of eight shrubs to the surface structure of the leaves was plotted, which showed that the largest content of dust retention of eight shrubs had positive correlation with stomata size on the leaf surface and had negative correlation with groove proportion, but the relationships between the content of dust retention and the number of leaf hairs, stomata density were not significant.
参考文献
[1] | 张家洋;周君丽;任敏;胡海波.20种城市道路绿化树木的滞尘能力比较[J].西北师范大学学报(自然科学版),2013(5):113-120. |
[2] | 张莉 .南京常见道路绿化树种的环境效益研究[D].南京林业大学,2007. |
[3] | 张景;吴祥云.阜新城区园林绿化植物叶片滞尘规律[J].辽宁工程技术大学学报(自然科学版),2011(6):905-908. |
[4] | 蔡燕徽 .城市基调树种滞尘效应及其光合特性研究[D].福建农林大学,2010. |
[5] | 赵松婷;李新宇;李延明.园林植物滞留不同粒径大气颗粒物的特征及规律[J].生态环境学报,2014(2):271-276. |
[6] | 李辰 .社区散生林木叶片滞留大气颗粒物能力研究[D].北京林业大学,2014. |
[7] | 余曼;汪正祥;雷耘;李中强;谭庆.武汉市主要绿化树种滞尘效应研究[J].环境工程学报,2009(7):1333-1339. |
[8] | 苏俊霞;靳绍军;闫金广;张钦弟;高瑞如;芦英梅.山西师范大学校园主要绿化植物滞尘能力的研究[J].山西师范大学学报(自然科学版),2006(2):85-88. |
[9] | 江胜利;金荷仙;许小连.杭州市常见道路绿化植物滞尘能力研究[J].浙江林业科技,2011(6):45-49. |
[10] | 王蓉丽;方英姿;马玲.金华市主要城市园林植物综合滞尘能力的研究[J].浙江农业科学,2009(3):574-577. |
[11] | 王会霞;王彦辉;杨佳;谢滨泽;石辉.不同绿化树种滞留PM2.5等颗粒污染物能力的多尺度比较[J].林业科学,2015(7):9-20. |
[12] | 李新宇;赵松婷;李延明;郭佳.北方常用园林植物滞留颗粒物能力评价[J].中国园林,2015(3):72-75. |
[13] | 郭伟;申屠雅瑾;郑述强;王惟;刘常富.城市绿地滞尘作用机理和规律的研究进展[J].生态环境学报,2010(6):1465-1470. |
[14] | 史琛媛;张玉梅;路亚星;李玉灵;徐学华.保定市几种常见绿化树种叶片滞尘能力研究[J].河北林果研究,2015(3):289-294. |
[15] | Lu Liu;Dongsheng Guan;M. R. Peart.The dust retention capacities of urban vegetation-a case study of Guangzhou, South China[J].Environmental Science and Pollution Research,20139(9):6601-6610. |
[16] | 阿丽亚·拜都热拉;玉米提·哈力克;塔依尔江·艾山;凯丽比努尔·努尔麦麦提.干旱区绿洲城市主要绿化树种最大滞尘量对比[J].林业科学,2015(3):57-64. |
[17] | 王赞红;李纪标.城市街道常绿灌木植物叶片滞尘能力及滞尘颗粒物形态[J].生态环境,2006(2):327-330. |
[18] | 杜艳伟;程建光;王静;薛建良.2013年青岛市PM2.5时空分布及来源分析[J].城市环境与城市生态,2015(2):17-19,24. |
[19] | 廉丽姝;高军靖;束炯.城市大气污染特征及其与气象因子的关系--以济南、青岛市为例[J].环境污染与防治,2011(5):22-26. |
[20] | 陆锡东;李萍娇;贺庆梅;牟光福;苏盛.宜州城区5种行道树叶表面特征及滞尘效果比较[J].河池学院学报,2014(5):37-43. |
[21] | 刘璐;管东生;陈永勤.广州市常见行道树种叶片表面形态与滞尘能力[J].生态学报,2013(8):2604-2614. |
[22] | 徐玮玮 .扬州古运河生态环境林绿地树种配置及环境效应研究[D].扬州大学,2007. |
- 下载量()
- 访问量()
- 您的评分:
-
10%
-
20%
-
30%
-
40%
-
50%