分析了制备工艺过程、球磨设备、试样放置时间以及球磨时间对NaAlH4放氢性能的影响.其中除了试样3是采用高能球磨机外,其它所有试样均采用行星式球磨机.结果表明,这些因素对NaAlH4放氢性能的影响非常明显.试样在球磨过程中经过上下翻转后,其放氢量明显比不翻转高出了50%(质量分数).不同球磨设备研究结果显示,试样3经过高能振动球磨机球磨后,其放氢量比行星式球磨机制备的试样的放氢量明显提高了.试样放置时间与试样球磨时间的研究结果显示,制备好的球磨试样经过24 h放置后,其放氢量明显提高.此外,试样经过不同时间球磨后,其放氢量也有明显的不同.经研究发现,球磨80 min试样的放氢量比球磨100 min和球磨40和60 min试样的放氢量要高,但和其它的影响因素相比,球磨时间对NaAlH4放氢性能的影响相对较小.
参考文献
[1] | Bogdanovi(c) B;Schwickardi M .[J].Journal of Alloys and Compounds,1997,253-254:1. |
[2] | Ji Woo Kim;Jae-Hyeok Shim;Seul Cham Kim et al.[J].Journal of Power Sources,2009,192:582. |
[3] | Gil-Jae Lee;Jae-Hyeok Shim;Young Whan Cho;Kyung Sub lee .Improvement in desorption kinetics of NaAlH_4 catalyzed with TiO_2 nanopowder[J].International journal of hydrogen energy,2008(14):3748-3753. |
[4] | Wang P;Jensen C M .[J].Journal of Alloys and Compounds,2004,379:99. |
[5] | Fichtner M;Engel J;Fuhr O et al.[J].Materials Science and Engineering,2004,B108:42. |
[6] | Dedrick D E;Kanouff M P;Replogle B C et al.[J].Journal of Alloys and Compounds,2005,389:299. |
[7] | Ozolins V;Majzoub E H;Udovic T J .[J].Journal of Alloys and Compounds,2004,375(1-2):1. |
[8] | Prozorov T;Wang J;Ebner A D et al.[J].Journal of Alloys and Compounds,2006,419(1-2):163. |
[9] | Lee G J;Shim J H.[J].Scripta Materialia,2007(56):125. |
[10] | Wang P .[J].Journal of Alloys and Compounds,2006,421:217. |
[11] | Cento C;Gislon P;Bilgili M et al.[J].Journal of Alloys and Compounds,2007,437(1-2):360. |
[12] | Pukazhselvan D;Sterlin L H M;Bipin K G et al.[J].Journal of Alloys and Compounds,2007,439(1-2):243. |
[13] | Lee G J;Kim J W;Shim J H.[J].Scripta Materialia |
[14] | Nico Eigen;Mirko Kunowsky;Thomas Klassen .Synthesis of NaAlH_4-based hydrogen storage material using milling under low pressure hydrogen atmosphere[J].Journal of Alloys and Compounds: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Materials Science and Solid-state Chemistry and Physics,2007(1/2):350-355. |
上一张
下一张
上一张
下一张
计量
- 下载量()
- 访问量()
文章评分
- 您的评分:
-
10%
-
20%
-
30%
-
40%
-
50%