欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

本文从系统的COP、制冷量和有效能分析三个方面比较了跨临界CO2蒸气压缩/喷射循环、蒸气压缩/回热制冷循环和常规的蒸气压缩制冷循环的性能.结果表明,在本文研究工况下,喷射循环的性能系数最大值比回热循环高18.6%,比常规循环高22.0%.喷射循环的制冷量比回热循环高8.2%,比常规循环高11.5%.有效能分析表明喷射循环极大地减小了节流损失,冷却放热损失和压缩损失也有相应的减少.

参考文献

[1] Kornhauser A A.The Use of an Ejector as a Refrigerant Expander[A].,1990:10-19.
[2] Nistir-5606.Nistir-5606.National Institute of Standards and Technology.Theoretical Evaluation of the Vapor compression Cycle with a Liquid-Line/Suction-Line Heat Exchanger,Economizer,and Ejector[S].,1995.
[3] 刘军朴,陈江平,陈芝久.跨临界二氧化碳蒸气压缩/喷射制冷循环[J].上海交通大学学报,2004(02):273-275.
[4] 马一太,管海清,杨俊兰,刘圣春.带引射器和经济器的CO2跨临界制冷系统[J].工程热物理学报,2005(02):189-192.
[5] Harrell G S;Kornhauser A A.Performance tests of a Two-Phase Ejector[A].Orlando,FL,1995:49-53.
[6] Menegay P;Kornhauser A A.Improvements to the Ejector Expansion Refrigeration Cycle[A].Washington,DC,1996:702-706.
[7] Somjin Disawas;Somchai Wongwises .Experimental investigation on the performance of the refrigeration cycle using a two-phase ejector as an expansion device[J].International Journal of Refrigeration,2004(6):587-594.
[8] 邓建强;姜培学;卢涛.跨临界二氧化碳蒸气压缩/喷射制冷循环理论分析[J].清华大学学报(自然科学版),2006
[9] G. K. Alexis;E. D. Rogdakis .A verification study of steam-ejector refrigeration model[J].Applied thermal engineering: Design, processes, equipment, economics,2003(1):29-36.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%