欢迎登录材料期刊网

材料期刊网

高级检索

采用ANSYS有限元分析软件对BT22钛合金固溶热处理后降温阶段温度场进行模拟,并绘制热处理工件在降温过程中的温度分布等值图,从温度-时间曲线和工件内部不同部位温度曲线两个角度分析温降的不均匀性.通过对比实测曲线和模拟曲线发现两者的相对误差在2%~5%,同时把实测降温曲线分为3个阶段:快速降温阶段、平缓降温阶段和慢降温阶段,并分析其形成的原因.

Internal temperature field of solid-solution treated BT22 titanium alloy during cooling was simulated using ANSYS finite element software and the temperature isopleth map of workpieces was plotted during this procedure. Inhomogeneity of temperature distribution during cooling was analyzed from two points of view, i.e. the temperature-time curve and position-temperature curve of workpiece interior. By comparison the relative error of actual curve and simulation curve is 2%-5%. The actual cooling curve was divided into three phases: fast cooling phase, gentle cooling phase and slow cooling phase. The reason of phase formation was also analyzed.

参考文献

[1] 魏寿庸;祝瀑;王韦琪 .[J].钛工业进展,1998,15(04):4.
[2] 任雁秋,李义科,贺友多,高仲龙,温治.加热炉热过程数学模型方法[J].包头钢铁学院学报,1999(04):423-427.
[3] 贺友多;刘中兴;李保卫 et al.[J].钢铁,1989,24(03):55.
[4] 余万华,刘新忠,戴石峰,韩静涛.加热钢坯内部温度的计算机模拟[J].轧钢,2005(05):17-20.
[5] 程秀玲,李胜玉,单水维.基于软测量的钢坯内部温度场分布研究[J].南方金属,2007(05):11-13.
[6] 张朝晖.ANSYS8.0热分析教程与实例解析[M].北京:中国铁道出版社,2005:3.
上一张 下一张
上一张 下一张
计量
  • 下载量()
  • 访问量()
文章评分
  • 您的评分:
  • 1
    0%
  • 2
    0%
  • 3
    0%
  • 4
    0%
  • 5
    0%